Bill sponsor
Rep. Russ Fulcher
Introduced the Halt Abusive Internet Lawsuits Act of 2026 on September 3. The official record identifies the bill and its referral to House Judiciary.
Working together
Coalition members.
Public support.
Meet the organizations and businesses in the coalition, and explore published positions on website litigation reform.
Coalition members
The organizations and businesses in our coalition.
Acxiom 
American Hotel & Lodging Association 
Association of Corporate Counsel 
IAB 
LiveRamp 
NACS 
National Association of Manufacturers 
National Automobile Dealers Association 
National Restaurant Association 
National Retail Federation 
Network Advertising Initiative 
News/Media Alliance 
NFIB 
Privacy for America 
Shopify 
Specialty Equipment Market Association 
U.S. Chamber of Commerce
Public statements · Checked September 25, 2026
The HAIL Act
HAIL Act supports H.R. 10263. The entries below document public positions; they do not imply membership in this project or endorsement of this website.
Published support for HAIL
Steptoe LLP
Law firm · September 14, 2026
A published client alert urges businesses to seek their representatives’ support for HAIL. It describes the federal proposal as broader relief following California’s narrower SB 690 compromise.
This is the firm’s published position, not a coalition-membership claim. The alert is attorney advertising and also offers lobbying assistance.
Related reform positions
These sources address the wider issue. They are not verified endorsements of H.R. 10263.
Federal reform advocacy
David French
NRF executive vice president of government relations · September 2026
In the Ripon Forum, French calls for congressional action on website wiretap litigation and describes uncertainty across state and federal laws.
The article does not name HAIL. Its publication is evidence of this stated reform position, not verification of every factual claim in the article.
Earlier SB 690 support
U.S. Chamber of Commerce
August 12, 2025
A signed letter supports California’s SB 690 and argues for clearer treatment of commercial data use and pending cases.
The letter concerns an earlier state-bill version. It does not establish support for HAIL or for every provision of the later enrolled SB 690 text.
Court position
Retail Litigation Center & U.S. Chamber
January 22, 2025
In Gutierrez v. Converse, the organizations filed an amicus brief seeking appellate clarification of the first clause of CIPA §631(a) as applied to the internet.
An argument in a court proceeding is distinct from a legislative endorsement.
Have a public support statement to add?
Send the organization’s name, the exact bill or version, and a dated public statement. We verify the attribution before publishing it.
Send the organization’s name, the exact bill or version, and a dated public statement. We verify the attribution before publishing it.